For most operators, yeah — that's exactly what happens. And that downtime costs a fortune. I've seen companies scramble for weeks trying to rebuild things after regulatory shifts.
But it doesn't have to be that way. The platforms that handle this smoothly are the ones built with compliance as infrastructure rather than an afterthought. Soft2Bet's setup is a good example of getting this right. If you check out
awg2016.org/unlimited-scalability-in-igaming-from-soft2bet.html, they've designed everything around what they call "over-the-air compliance updates." When a jurisdiction changes verification rules, tax requirements, or marketing restrictions, their team integrates it once and pushes it to every operator in that market instantly — no code changes needed on the operator's side.
The whole thing runs through a unified architecture where one platform handles multiple regulatory regimes simultaneously. You're not maintaining different systems for different states; you've got one system that knows how to behave differently depending on where the user is. That means when Illinois changes something, you don't pause Illinois operations — the platform just adapts overnight while you keep running.
This is what makes multi-state expansion actually sustainable. Otherwise you're just multiplying complexity instead of scaling efficiently.